Ok, so in Salesforce.com you have Roles, Profiles, User Records, Sharing Settings, Organization Wide Defaults, Field Level Security, Page Layouts, Lists, Views, Reports, Folders and more to segment, hide or display data in different ways. Confused yet with this massive interrelation of data management tools? Well, time to introduce Territory Management into the mix.
Most small organizations might only have the need for a public security structure in Salesforce in which everyone see’s everything and can modify everything. Fine.
Most medium sized organizations can survive simply with Salesforce profiles, roles and possibly sharing settings. Great.
What happens when you are managing a Global organization with multiple product divisions, complex sales territories, difficult International legal requirements (German worker’s council, embargoed countries, etc) and varying visibility requirements per Sales Region, Mega Region and Global Regions? This situation is much more complicated, but entirely doable in Salesforce.com using Roles, Profiles, Territories and Sharing Settings.
Imagine only North America. Imagine that there are 3 product divisions selling to 5 different sales regions. The 3 product divisions all sell to the same sales regions, but sell different products. The product divisions need a Manager/Salesperson management concept within Salesforce.com where the Manager has delete/transfer access for all Salesperson data. Certain sales people need to be able to cross sell multiple Products within one region. The reporting structure needs to be done by division (upwards). Sales people in one sales region should be able to view all Accounts belonging to one region (determined by groups of states), even if they belong to someone else in a different role (possibly managers).
This is a common scenario that can get much more complex in large, International corporations in multi-million dollar Salesforce deployments.
This is how this would be represented in Salesforce:
Roles – Hierarchy of roles represent the Product Divisions. Each division is broken down into Sales Region roles representing both Managers and Sales People and possibly Sales Partners. Partners and Sales People both report to the Manager role. Reporting is primarily done by role, because VP’s/CEO’s for these Product Divisions typically only care about their own sales
Territories – Hierarchy of territories that represent the Sales Regions. An example would be: 1 – World, 2 – North America 3 – East N.A.. This can be as granular as necessary. Rules will be defined that automatically associate Accounts with these territory “buckets.” So, not East N.A. has a collection of Accounts in East North America that you can assign to any group that you would like. It is best to provide the minimum sharing capability for these by default.
Sharing Settings – Sharing Settings are what actually assign Territories to Roles in SFDC. For example, for the Product Line 1, East North America role, you can assign the Territory and Subordinates for the associated Territory. This will allow the users in this role to see everything within this region and also cross sell multiple products. The divisional reporting structure still remains.
Contact me if you would like to know if this could be utilized for your organization. I have worked with this a lot!
Tags: hierarchies, roles, sales process, security, sharing settings, territories, territory, territory management
Posted in Business Analysis, Salesforce.com | 8 Comments »
This one is an oldie, but goodie. I love the process maps that Salesforce released a while back.
These sales methodology process maps can be sliced, diced and used by any industry in some way. Some portions might need to be removed and some terminology might need to be changed, but generally the marketing aspects and sales processes in thes process maps are universal across all businesses in some way.
These sales process and marketing process maps can be downloaded in full color in both PowerPoint and PDF formats. They follow the process from Generating Leads to Optimizing Lead Flow to Closing More Deals within Salesforce.com.
Of course, each major stage in the process gives example metrics that you might like to record such as Lead Quality and Lead Source as well as Month to Date Sales Trending and Top Sales Reps.
One interesting point to note is that there are several stages in the game where you are following up possible sales in Salesforce.com: Qualifying Leads, Following up on Opportunities and Re-Marketing to your existing Customer/Lead database.
Tags: marketing, marketing process, process maps, sales, sales process
Posted in Business Analysis, marketing, sales, Salesforce.com | Comments Off on Sales and Marketing Process Maps